[ Search | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Stacie White (Changes)
Date: 10/11/02
Time: 9:05:51 PM
Remote Name: 65.171.29.252
Josh, Things look good, but there are some changes that need to be made:
We need to make sure that EACH E>S and S>E and all casual chains are seperated. (Use the enter button or return button to do this, before posting; they should be their own paragraph) The beginning ones are seperated very well, but the ending ones are very much jumbled with huge paragraphs encompassing all the reactions for a certian sphere. Please seperate each reaction and make EACH REACTION a seperate paragraph. I know this makes it longer, but if it is jumbled then we might get points off. (Make sure that once they are seperated they each have resources to support the reasoning).
We MUST have resources in each causal chain to support our reasoning. Without resources the reaction is only our opinions. Ask the others for their resources for the casual chains, that will save you some time. Here are some casual chain resources for mine:
E>A>L (http://library.thinkquest.org/) (http://www.geology.sdsu.edu/how_volcanoes_work/climate_effects.html)
E>A>B>H (http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Study?Volcano/) (http://www.geology.sdsu.edu/how_volcanoes_work/climate_effects.html)
E>A>L>H>B (http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Study/Volcano/) NASA's Earth Science EnterpriseCD-ROM
There are some redundant (same reaction worded differently than the other, means the same)causal chain reactions that need to be deleted. We do not want the same chains (EX. E>L>A>B -- E>A>L>B) in the study. They will be counted off.
I'll check back later to see if I can help. Don't worry, it's not that much change, just a little editing. Thanks Josh for the hard work.